Salo or the 120 Days of Sodom 1975 Full Movie Download Free Full Movie in English

IMDB Rating: 5.8/10

Genre: Adult | Drama

Cast: Paolo Bonacelli, Giorgio Cataldi, Uberto Paolo Quintavalle

Director: Pier Paolo Pasolini

SCREENSHOTS

480p Download Links:

https://drop.download/b9q1joc3jfv5

https://dgdrive.xyz/n2ice0uyuyr8

https://sbrapid.com/qg7ee9as5p4o.html

https://ahvsh.com/w/scymy3lfrjx6

720p Download Links:

https://drop.download/e6i4uf657h2l

https://dgdrive.xyz/xkm7oygghybc

https://sbrapid.com/a9oacnh8u5ei.html

https://ahvsh.com/w/2wnlhqobx12y

Movies Like This:

Lady Voyeur

Description:

The film focuses on four wealthy, corrupt Italian libertines in the time of the fascist Republic of Salò (1943–1945). The libertines kidnap 18 teenagers and subject them to four months of extreme violence, sadism, and sexual and psychological torture. The film explores themes of  political corruption, consumerism, authoritarianism, nihilism, morality, capitalism, totalitarianism, sadism, sexuality, and fascism. The story is in four segments, inspired by Dante’s Divine Comedy: the Anteinferno, the Circle of Manias, the Circle of Shit, and the Circle of Blood. The film also contains frequent references to and several discussions of Friedrich Nietzsche’s 1887 book On the Genealogy of Morality, Ezra Pound’s poem The Cantos, and Marcel Proust’s novel sequence In Search of Lost Time.

Salo or the 120 Days of Sodom 1975 Full Movie Dual Audio Hindi and English Download Free or Watch Online 480p 720p 400mb 700mb, KatmovieHD, SkymoviesHD, Katmovie18

Storyline:

Premiering at the Paris Film Festival on 23 November 1975, the film had a brief theatrical run in Italy before being banned in January 1976, and was released in the United States the following year on 3 October 1977. Because it depicts youths subjected to graphic violence, torture, sexual abuse, and murder, the film was controversial upon its release and has remained banned in many countries.

The confluence of thematic content in the film—ranging from the political and socio-historical, to psychological and sexual—has led to much critical discussion. It has been both praised and decried by various film historians and critics and was named the 65th-scariest film ever made by the Chicago Film Critics Association in 2006. It is also the subject of an entry in The Penguin Encyclopedia of Horror and the Supernatural (1986).